Comp @ s : Tomorrow May 11, 8:00 am and 5:30 p.m. meeting at ESE13: 00pm and 4:00 p.m. assemblies in the ESIA Disseminating and Organizing
! No to the imposition of the new Regulations
Students of IPN: On 3 May, the Directorate-General issued a draft amendment to Regulation Studies Schooling for middle-and higher the IPN, which have called General Regulation Studies (GER). The Fellowship of the IPN, first you should know that in 2006 and was an attempt of this kind, which was stopped with the mobilization of thousands of students from multiple colleges and vocational schools. Today, again seek to promote these changes, seeking the same goal: to reduce social spending for public education in Mexico, and dismantle the Polytechnic Institute to become a low academic and scientific development. Here are some reasons to oppose the adoption and implementation of new rules: 1. For higher education: the introduction of the figure called "Professional Member" means reducing the degree of BA at a university senior technical simple. That is, through the so-called "side exits" will become the formation of moderately trained graduates, which involves the perception of even lower wages and fewer opportunities to find a place in the labor market (Articles 3,5,37,42,43,62,68,69). An APO NOT A GRADUATE OR ENGINEER, in fact, is a student being unable to prove their subjects can opt for a Technical Certificate (Article 69). Thus, the Institute abandons its commitment to provide opportunities for students to complete their preparation profesional.2. For the secondary level: the figure of "Technical", which offers students a degree of "expertise", which IS NOT A PART OF TECHNICAL (Article 37) because, as in the upper level, students can leave the Vocational, offering a supposed "evidence" of very low category, nor be permitted entry into a career universitaria.3. The introduction of new educational model, seeks to promote virtual education (Article 33). Along with the figure of the facilitator (Article 66), the new regulation aims to make students "self-taught" and that teachers are not required to teach but to be merely "facilitators" of learning. This course seeks to reduce the number of teachers and, therefore, wage costs construction and maintenance of educational infrastructure, as students would take classes on-line, ie, internet.4. The "side exits" are actually false starts because the new regulation does not clearly explain the procedure for approval of the materials when the student has failed in the normal course (Article 62). It only indicates that the student has the options already known as the ETS and the resource, but does not mention anything about issues such as opinions, maximum number of materials that can fail, deadlines, etc.. (What Chapter V of the current regulation says YES). In that sense, the trend is that minimize approval options of materials, edging students to opt for the "output side" and abandon their undergraduate training. There is already a precedent for this: in the regulations that the authorities tried to impose in 2006, requiring the minimum score of 8 to pass a subject, ie students who did not get that rating would be accumulated and therefore failed subjects would have to graduate by a "side exit", as they would be prevented from continuing with their education. The implementation of these measures on racing physics and mathematics areas and medico-biological where most of students passed the materials until after the third or fourth attempt because of the complexity and nature of the races, would be simply disastrous and entirely predictable: a large pool of graduates, driven to choose a "side exit, with a degree Preparation frankly mediocre. Of course, the careers of social and administrative area would not be exempt from that process. Now, in the context of this new attempt by the authorities to modify the rules, "side outlets" are a different mechanism to achieve the same goal: to generate non-senior technicians and engineers graduates or highly capacitados.5. About CENLEX. GER divides students students and "users of educational services, which are CENLEX students, workshops, courses, diploma, etc. (Article 3.7). The term "service user" reveals a clear trend towards the legalization of charging fees for language courses, workshops and diploma, which is already done, albeit in a completely illegal because the IPN Organic Act clearly states that education to provide the Institute should be free (Article 5 of the Organic Law), and that includes language courses, courses and workshops. For the latter costs currently paid over 2000 pesos.6. Mobility (Article 3,40,42,43,51). By setting common trunks shared among different degrees, is to reduce the diversity and the field of knowledge which by its very nature has each of the programs given in the IPN. That way, you lose the scientific expertise of each race and the likelihood that the Institute will contribute to scientific and technological development country.7. Jurisdiction (Article 3,40,43,45,61). The new learning approach will be for "competencies" that is, is to develop only the necessary minimum skills a student requires for its "environment" immediately, which gives it a pro-business profile of the Institute, giving priority business incubation and small business development. At the same time, removing the student the opportunity to learn, analyze, understand and solve large-scale processes in the social, economic, political, scientific, technological, etc. Limiting the depth and development of their analytical and creative. In this sense, it explains the introduction of the mode called "skills assessment" in which credit is allowed without having cursado.8 materials. Electives (Article 48.49). According to the new educational model, these materials are similar to: Reading and Writing Workshop, Workshop on Culture and Sport Leadership Workshop Oral and Written Expression, which obviously are not themselves part of the formation of a professional especializado.9 scientifically. GER states that the records and ballots shall be subject to "emission standards" (Article 79) Does this legalize charges for issuing these documents, which already happens in practice? 10. Is unacceptably deceptive the way the authorities intended to simulate a "consultation" to adopt rules of procedure. The only time was 10 days (including holidays of bridges) to analyze the complete document How will the authorities to summarize the proposals of thousands students in less than a month, that is, for the second "consultation"? It is clear that the "consultation" is just a cynical simulation. Technical NO, YES graduates! http://coordinaciondevocacionales.blogspot.com
! No to the imposition of the new Regulations
Students of IPN: On 3 May, the Directorate-General issued a draft amendment to Regulation Studies Schooling for middle-and higher the IPN, which have called General Regulation Studies (GER). The Fellowship of the IPN, first you should know that in 2006 and was an attempt of this kind, which was stopped with the mobilization of thousands of students from multiple colleges and vocational schools. Today, again seek to promote these changes, seeking the same goal: to reduce social spending for public education in Mexico, and dismantle the Polytechnic Institute to become a low academic and scientific development. Here are some reasons to oppose the adoption and implementation of new rules: 1. For higher education: the introduction of the figure called "Professional Member" means reducing the degree of BA at a university senior technical simple. That is, through the so-called "side exits" will become the formation of moderately trained graduates, which involves the perception of even lower wages and fewer opportunities to find a place in the labor market (Articles 3,5,37,42,43,62,68,69). An APO NOT A GRADUATE OR ENGINEER, in fact, is a student being unable to prove their subjects can opt for a Technical Certificate (Article 69). Thus, the Institute abandons its commitment to provide opportunities for students to complete their preparation profesional.2. For the secondary level: the figure of "Technical", which offers students a degree of "expertise", which IS NOT A PART OF TECHNICAL (Article 37) because, as in the upper level, students can leave the Vocational, offering a supposed "evidence" of very low category, nor be permitted entry into a career universitaria.3. The introduction of new educational model, seeks to promote virtual education (Article 33). Along with the figure of the facilitator (Article 66), the new regulation aims to make students "self-taught" and that teachers are not required to teach but to be merely "facilitators" of learning. This course seeks to reduce the number of teachers and, therefore, wage costs construction and maintenance of educational infrastructure, as students would take classes on-line, ie, internet.4. The "side exits" are actually false starts because the new regulation does not clearly explain the procedure for approval of the materials when the student has failed in the normal course (Article 62). It only indicates that the student has the options already known as the ETS and the resource, but does not mention anything about issues such as opinions, maximum number of materials that can fail, deadlines, etc.. (What Chapter V of the current regulation says YES). In that sense, the trend is that minimize approval options of materials, edging students to opt for the "output side" and abandon their undergraduate training. There is already a precedent for this: in the regulations that the authorities tried to impose in 2006, requiring the minimum score of 8 to pass a subject, ie students who did not get that rating would be accumulated and therefore failed subjects would have to graduate by a "side exit", as they would be prevented from continuing with their education. The implementation of these measures on racing physics and mathematics areas and medico-biological where most of students passed the materials until after the third or fourth attempt because of the complexity and nature of the races, would be simply disastrous and entirely predictable: a large pool of graduates, driven to choose a "side exit, with a degree Preparation frankly mediocre. Of course, the careers of social and administrative area would not be exempt from that process. Now, in the context of this new attempt by the authorities to modify the rules, "side outlets" are a different mechanism to achieve the same goal: to generate non-senior technicians and engineers graduates or highly capacitados.5. About CENLEX. GER divides students students and "users of educational services, which are CENLEX students, workshops, courses, diploma, etc. (Article 3.7). The term "service user" reveals a clear trend towards the legalization of charging fees for language courses, workshops and diploma, which is already done, albeit in a completely illegal because the IPN Organic Act clearly states that education to provide the Institute should be free (Article 5 of the Organic Law), and that includes language courses, courses and workshops. For the latter costs currently paid over 2000 pesos.6. Mobility (Article 3,40,42,43,51). By setting common trunks shared among different degrees, is to reduce the diversity and the field of knowledge which by its very nature has each of the programs given in the IPN. That way, you lose the scientific expertise of each race and the likelihood that the Institute will contribute to scientific and technological development country.7. Jurisdiction (Article 3,40,43,45,61). The new learning approach will be for "competencies" that is, is to develop only the necessary minimum skills a student requires for its "environment" immediately, which gives it a pro-business profile of the Institute, giving priority business incubation and small business development. At the same time, removing the student the opportunity to learn, analyze, understand and solve large-scale processes in the social, economic, political, scientific, technological, etc. Limiting the depth and development of their analytical and creative. In this sense, it explains the introduction of the mode called "skills assessment" in which credit is allowed without having cursado.8 materials. Electives (Article 48.49). According to the new educational model, these materials are similar to: Reading and Writing Workshop, Workshop on Culture and Sport Leadership Workshop Oral and Written Expression, which obviously are not themselves part of the formation of a professional especializado.9 scientifically. GER states that the records and ballots shall be subject to "emission standards" (Article 79) Does this legalize charges for issuing these documents, which already happens in practice? 10. Is unacceptably deceptive the way the authorities intended to simulate a "consultation" to adopt rules of procedure. The only time was 10 days (including holidays of bridges) to analyze the complete document How will the authorities to summarize the proposals of thousands students in less than a month, that is, for the second "consultation"? It is clear that the "consultation" is just a cynical simulation. Technical NO, YES graduates! http://coordinaciondevocacionales.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment