The negotiations that ended the UEPC and the government, which includes an increase of 27, 5% for the entire year in two installments, is far being a wage recovery agreement. It is really a governance agreement. Dates hurry, what with classes to start growing before, union and government were quick to close, to ensure the normal start of activities. Of course "normal" here is just a euphemism for the teachers not started with unemployment, but that normally is not noticed in the schools whose construction plans made last year thanks to the student struggle did not mean the solution of the deficit building complex, but merely a painted face. However, despite any "normal" who want to display, this pact of governance will be difficult to sustain. On the one hand, because it is tied to the twists and turns which will this year election, as many of the leaders of our guild are linked to the different variants of pejotismo although they have already sealed their alliance K with the "right" which they say soy to fight. But mostly, because it is linked to the need of the teachers. No means no by far, the recovery of our purchasing power, long beaten.
The agreement follows closely the meager salary established by the Joint National and CTERA Kirchner. In one of the richest cities in the country, the starting salary becomes pesos in March 2420 and July 2515, when teachers in Santa Fe are starting to get a 3283 pesos.
was not easy to UEPC celestial driving this deal done. Four departments, including the largest, Capital and Rio Cuarto, rejection and proposed mandated control plans. Among the departments that accepted were not the least of their mandates acknowledging the inadequacy of the government's proposal and demanded that negotiations be reopened in July to get better gains. The celestial body itself, the department, showed the difficulty to pass the agreement through phony votes maneuvers and fourth category by driving. The objective of the agreement is not to wage recovery, but seeks to constrict to teaching a wide agreement the year and avoid the government of the province the problem of teacher salaries. However, the guild had to put the claim number and a figure above 20%, not when you have to "negotiate" in the abstract without articulating the needs of teachers, but only taking over the government. This is symptomatic of the difficulty of maintaining such arrangements. Can not the UEPC
alone, even under such agreements CTERA, sustaining a social pact has been broken at the national level the Guild strike oilers were to strike for $ 5000 basic. A tangible result of this breach of social contract was that fellow teachers Santa Fe got an increase of $ 750 for teachers who have just begun. Today trade unions come to pose a floor of 30%, which, in cases that have a low base, rising to 40% (Clarín, 07/03).
Teachers know that what is achieved without a struggle, rather than conquest, is a gift, which is usually given in exchange for something. To ensure that system, the government of the province of Cordoba is the conduct of UEPC. But the situation is not simple either.
It is clear that to organize a plan to combat the rise to the occasion, we need to reclaim our unions to be independent of government and the bosses' parties.
workers Córdoba teachers must organize ourselves to impose our guild a battle plan to get a pay rise according to our needs, which can not be less than 40% and no fees and aspire to 5000 from basic. Nobody can close the year below what they got fellow Santa Fe
Organize each school to reject this covenant of poverty wages, and to give the fight against the collapse of education and in defense of our working conditions, for better conditions edilicias, for housing for teachers, by 82% mobile for retirees and for all the claims of the union.
We propose to prepare a whole in which we participate all the teachers who reject agreements misery of the union leadership, and we can form a common front to fight for our demands and lay the foundations for recovery of the union of the hands of the government ombudsmen. FRANCO B.
0 comments:
Post a Comment